June
28: #16, 2001: A Space Odyssey
What
the HAL happened up there?
This
was my second viewing of 2001
and I enjoyed it about as much as the first time, though I wasn't
particularly excited to watch a half hour of monkey business at the
start and another half hour of a space-themed acid trip at the end of
the film again.
Yes,
I know what the monkey part is supposed to mean. Everything Stanley Kubrick
does is intentional (which is usually a good thing) and you can dive
waaaay into the intro and ending if you'd like. Those parts still
detract from the film upon subsequent viewings and are far longer
than they need to be in order to make their point. And even Kubrick's
much-loved match cut from the bone to the satellite, while cool, is
way too on the nose to be compelling symbolism.
If
there's anything I don't love about 2001,
it's just that: I feel like about half of the film is pretty much
Kubrick jerking off. He finally had free reign to express himself and
he decided to make a masturbatory ode to his own genius.
That's
the bad stuff. However, sandwiched in between the beginning and
extended ending is a truly compelling science fiction story featuring
remarkable special effects that still hold up almost 50 years later.
For that reason, this is a movie that must be seen.
"Why yes, I can burn off your hemorrhoids, though it's a most uncommon request." |
Within
the middle part of the film, the methodical pace didn't bother me.
Even the black screen during the introduction is used to great
effect, as the original score is used to build tension right away.
Kubrick provides a ton of memorable shots in this film. The shot of
doomed astronaut Frank floating away from the safety of the pod when
the AI computer HAL 9000 turns on him is beautiful, for
instance.
Kubrick's version of the future is purposefully sterile, from the visuals inside the ships to the PR speak being used to cover up a disaster in the first part of the story set in the future. Kubrick alternates long, static shots in space with more dynamic close-ups, while doing the same with static shots and tracking shots inside the ships themselves. Of course, Kubrick's version of the future also looks like it was co-designed by Austin Powers, but that's what happens when you try to predict what things will look like in 2001 when you're still living in the mid-1960s.
Kubrick's version of the future is purposefully sterile, from the visuals inside the ships to the PR speak being used to cover up a disaster in the first part of the story set in the future. Kubrick alternates long, static shots in space with more dynamic close-ups, while doing the same with static shots and tracking shots inside the ships themselves. Of course, Kubrick's version of the future also looks like it was co-designed by Austin Powers, but that's what happens when you try to predict what things will look like in 2001 when you're still living in the mid-1960s.
The
acting is capably done, although the cast is a bit hamstrung by what
surely was Kubrick's insistence on a dry, emotionless reading of the
script. Still, when it comes time for Keir Dullea to duel wits with
naughty computer HAL 9000 later in the film, Dullea plays his part well
and mirrors our surprise when HAL famously opts not to open the bay
doors for him. When HAL coldly ends the conversation, it's a
wonderful “holy shit” moment.
They should have stuck with the Andre 3000 instead. |
2001:
A Space Odyssey
is pretty much mandatory viewing. However, while it's a film that
everyone should see once, it's also one that many people won't bother
seeing twice. At the very least, they might skip some of the
beginning and end. If you do, don't worry. I won't judge.
Grade:
B+
No comments:
Post a Comment